Episode 80: Radka Newton, Jean Mutton, and Michael Doherty on Redesigning Higher Ed

Listen On

Episode 80: Radka Newton, Jean Mutton, and Michael Doherty on Redesigning Higher Ed
The Connected College

How can you transform higher education through human-centered design? How can you listen to people and gather insights that inform and inspire changes to programs and policies? What role can design play in helping institutions get real results to improve their student experience? We dive into these questions with the Radka Newton, Michael Doherty, and Jean Mutton, co-editors of the great book Transforming Higher Education with Human Centered Design.

In the traditional landscape of higher education, success is often viewed through the narrow lens of metrics: graduation rates, GPAs, and post-grad employment statistics. While these "destination" markers matter, they often ignore the "journey"—the lived experience of the student navigating the university machinery. In a recent episode of the Connected College Podcast, I sat down with three pioneers in the field—Radka, Michael, and Jean—to discuss how human-centered design is shifting the focus from systems to people.

Moving Beyond Top-Down Success Metrics

One of the biggest hurdles in higher education leadership is the tendency to define success from the top down. Michael, the world’s first professor of legal design, argues that we shouldn’t proceed based on assumptions. Success isn't a monolith; it’s a personal goal that varies from one student to another. For some, it’s gaining the confidence to lead; for others, it’s the agency to navigate complex societal systems.

Jean, an expert in service design, takes this a step further, noting that it isn’t up to administrators to define what a "win" looks like for a student. If a student finishes their degree feeling empowered and happy, even if they didn't land a "first-class" honors, that is a success. The goal of design is to ensure the university is built to help students achieve their individual ambitions, not just satisfy a league table.

Busting Silos with Service Design

Universities are notoriously complex. Jean famously describes them as "30 organizations that share a car park." This fragmentation creates silos that hinder student success. This is where human-centered design (HCD) becomes a transformative tool. By using methods like journey mapping and service blueprinting, institutions can give a voice to "backstage" staff—those in administration and IT—and connect their work to the "frontstage" student experience.

When you map out the student journey, everyone in the organization begins to see how their specific role impacts the whole. It’s a holistic approach that moves the needle from "efficiency for the sake of the system" to "effectiveness for the sake of the human."

Lived Experience is the New Data

A common critique of design thinking in academia is that it feels "fluffy" compared to hard statistical data. However, Radka points out that lived experience is data. Just as the health sector looks at what it feels like to be a patient, higher education must look at what it feels like to be a student.

Does a student feel "lazy" because they missed a lecture, or did they simply miss the only bus from their off-campus housing? When we acknowledge feelings and personal circumstances as valid data points, we can design better interventions. Michael’s work in legal design proves this: by humanizing communication and clarifying expectations, his law school saw a 10-to-12 point jump in student satisfaction, outperforming many high-reputation peers.

The Future of Co-Creation in Higher Ed

The future of higher education leadership lies in co-creation. We are moving away from a model where students are consulted as an afterthought and toward one where they are active agents in the design process. Radka highlights that design helps flatten hierarchies, allowing students to sit at the table as co-creators rather than just "customers" of a service.

As we face the challenges of AI, changing demographics, and evolving cultural norms, the "designerly" mindset—one that is open, vulnerable, and willing to listen—will be the most valuable asset a university leader can possess.

Conclusion: Be a Being, Not a Doing

Ultimately, human-centered design reminds us that universities are made of humans, for humans. By shifting our focus from "human doing" (the tasks and the rules) to "human being" (the emotions and the connections), we create institutions where students don't just graduate—they thrive.

Episode 80 Transcript

Previous
Previous

Episode 81: Greg Pillar on Rewiring the Academy by Leading with Hope

Next
Next

Episode 79: Chase Williams on Digital Hubs to Advance Institutional Strategy