Episode 130: Jeff Doyle and Elliot Felix on Measuring and Building Belonging

Listen On

Episode 130: Jeff Doyle and Elliot Felix on Measuring and Building Belonging
The Connected College

How can higher education leaders measure student belonging, and what specific strategies directly boost retention? How can colleges and universities use their facilities, programming, communications, traditions, and more to shape a student's sense of belonging? In this bonus episode originally presented at NASPA’s Student Success in Higher Education Conference, Jeff Doyle and Elliot Felix tackle these questions. This episode examines national retention data, early pulse survey metrics, actionable frameworks, and practical strategies to help leaders break down campus silos, design inclusive student spaces, and leverage peer connections to drive long-term degree completion.

Building Belonging in Higher Education: A Practical Framework for Student Success

Creating a genuine sense of belonging on campus is one of the most powerful ways to drive higher education student success, retention, and graduation rates. When students feel supported, valued, and connected to a campus community, they are far more likely to persist through academic and social challenges. But how can you measure it and improve it? Jeff Doyle and Elliot Felix discuss these in this episode, originally presented at NASPA’s Student Success in Higher Education Conference. Drawing from national data, evidence-based campus interventions, and student retention research, higher education administrators can implement actionable strategies to cultivate belonging across physical, digital, and interpersonal environments.

The National Landscape of Student Belonging

National datasets provide a clear picture of how student belonging directly impacts key retention and graduation metrics. According to the National College Health Assessment, approximately 70.5% of surveyed students report feeling that they belong at their institution. Similarly, longitudinal data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) indicates that 77% to 80% of students feel valued, comfortable being themselves, and part of their campus community.

However, belonging metrics vary across specific student populations:

  • Transfer Students: Report 4% lower sense of belonging than non-transfer peers.

  • Part-Time Students: Report 5% lower sense of belonging than full-time peers.

  • Off-Campus Commuters: Report 8% lower sense of belonging than on-campus residents.

Quantifying belonging matters because it directly predicts long-term success. Students with a strong sense of belonging are 41% more likely to persist from their first to second year. Furthermore, research demonstrates that a single one-point increase on a five-point belonging scale correlates with a 3.4 percentage point increase in graduation rates. Additionally, early pulse surveys conducted during weeks three to six of the semester reveal that students who strongly disagree that they belong are five times more likely to stop out ten months later compared to their peers.

Five Key Strategies to Foster Campus Belonging

Higher education leaders can implement five core strategies to cultivate belonging across campus environments:

1. Elevate Identity and Affinity Spaces: Identity and affinity group spaces—such as Asian student centers, LGBTQ+ centers, and multicultural spaces—frequently record lower satisfaction rates when relegated to isolated or outdated facilities. Updating, centralizing, and properly resourcing these spaces helps students find their community through a dedicated physical environment.

2. Strengthen the First-Year Experience: The first-year transition offers a critical window for building early connections through specialized programming, orientation camps, mentoring, and first-year seminars. Extended orientation traditions and peer-led introductions build early institutional pride and social integration before classes begin.

3. Eliminate Digital Sprawl and Unmask the Hidden Curriculum: Services, support resources, and involvement opportunities are frequently spread across disconnected physical and digital environments, creating confusion for students navigating campus systems. Implementing unified student portals centralizes access to resources, unmasks the hidden curriculum, and simplifies support access, directly improving multi-year retention rates.

4. Integrate Academic Support into Everyday Student Spaces: Co-locating academic and co-curricular support services—such as tutoring, writing assistance, career advising, and financial aid—within high-traffic student hubs like the library normalizes help-seeking behavior. Integrating support alongside study space removes social stigma and makes receiving assistance a routine part of the student experience.

5. Empower Student Ownership and Peer Leadership: Providing students with direct ownership over campus space programming, student-run enterprises, and peer involvement advising deepens institutional investment. Programs that employ student involvement advisors or offer financial aid tied to high-impact practices significantly boost engagement and success rates among underrepresented and low-income students.

The Doyle Sense of Belonging Inventory

The Doyle Sense of Belonging Inventory posits that measuring and improving belonging requires evaluating five foundational pillars:

  1. Institutional Identification: Understanding institutional traditions, history, and feeling proud to be part of the campus identity.

  2. Social Acceptance: Feeling welcomed, valued, and visually represented across campus environments and leadership.

  3. Social Capital: Possessing the navigational knowledge, resources, and institutional support needed to succeed.

  4. Connections to Faculty and Staff: Developing meaningful relationships with faculty and staff members who demonstrate genuine care for student well-being.

  5. Peer Connections: Building strong friendships, participating in student organizations, and engaging in collaborative learning opportunities.

By systematically measuring these pillars and deploying targeted interventions, higher education leaders can build connected colleges where all students thrive.

Episode 130 Transcript

Next
Next

Episode 129: Lutalo Sanifu on Creating New Career Paths and Programs with Partners